2016–2018

Feedzai

AI/ML Risk Management and Fraud Prevention. Two flagship products, a $50M valuation milestone, and where I started designing for machine learning rather than around it.

Fintech Risk Intelligence AI / ML B2B SaaS
Abstract diagram: a timer and code editor feeding into a browser buy flow, connecting through to a global alert siren
Role Lead Product Designer
Company Feedzai · Lisbon, PT
Period 2016–2018
Stage Series C · now a unicorn
Focus Case Manager · Insights · UX Research · Design Team
The Situation

Sophisticated technology, a legacy product, a team of two

Feedzai builds AI-powered fraud and risk detection for banks. The technology was sophisticated; the legacy Alert Manager analysts acted on it with was not. I joined as the second designer to build the practice, for analysts making hundreds of judgment calls a day.

My Remit

Design the product. Establish the practice.

  • Design Case Manager from scratch: risk and case management, data visualisation, configuration
  • Grow the design team from two people to eight
  • Build a UX research practice: workshops, personas, usability testing
  • Make ML output legible without a data science background
Who It Was For

Three people, one queue

Forty-plus interviews produced three archetypes: a manager answering for throughput, an investigator in the queue all day, a new analyst still learning the work.

Three research personas: Clara the Manager, a fraud manager; Mark the Detective, an investigator; and Kate the Intern, a new analyst, each with goals and frustrations
Defining the Problem

Structure before screens

Case Manager needed a structure analysts could hold in their head: nine sections, tested on paper first.

Case Manager information architecture: Search, Overview, Alerts, Entities, Analytics, Rules, Pos/Neg, Admin, Profile Paper sketches and user flows, followed by mid-fidelity wireframes of the Self-Service Rules and Case Manager Helper screens Transaction Statistics report and Business Overview dashboard: alert volumes, approval rates and team performance
The Work

From legacy alert queue to decision workspace

High-fidelity screens replaced the Alert Manager one workflow at a time, each tested through moderated sessions. The interface followed the analyst's decision process, not the data model, and Insights put ML output in a form compliance could trust.

Alert Details screen: customer profile, payment methods and activity log, alongside the Alerts queue with score, status and entity columns Gross Fraud Performance dashboard: totals by approval type, trend over time, and fraud by region on a world map

Case Manager: evaluative research

Recurring tests with a fixed cohort: task success, SUS, attrakdiff.

Usability testing sessions (July 2016 + January 2017)

SUS scores of 91.5 (A, Excellent) and 88.5 (B, Excellent), and Attrakdiff pragmatic quality, hedonic quality, attractiveness and goodness ratings
Key Decisions

Two calls that shaped the outcome

01

Design the AI as a collaborator, not an authority

The score was visible, never the headline. Analysts saw the evidence first, and caught errors automation would have missed.

02

Audit trail as a design constraint, not an afterthought

Every decision had regulatory weight. Building the audit trail in from day one, not as a later report, shaped every interaction.

Components, documentation and academy

Scaling meant documenting it: a UI kit and a Feedzai Academy platform built with technical writing.

Feedzai UI kit library and documentation, the Feedzai Developers portal, and Feedzai Academy: a training platform for onboarding co-workers and customers
Outcome

Products that analysts trusted

Where a bad decision carries financial consequence, trust is the only measure. Both became defining products in Feedzai's expansion.

$50M Series C raised during launch, 2017
2→8 Design team growth during tenure
40+ Research sessions with fraud analysts
2 Flagship products shipped end to end
SUS 91.5–88.5 Excellent range across testing rounds
Reflection

What this changed

Feedzai is where I first designed alongside machine learning rather than in front of it. Making model output legible without eroding human judgment is a problem I have carried since.

The model score was never the headline. Evidence first, then the model's assessment.